logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2017.11.09 2016가합9619
물품대금
Text

1. The claims in respect of KRW 1,257,295,770 expanded in the lawsuit in this case shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company aimed at wholesale business, etc., and the Defendant is a company for the purpose of selling and distributing steel and non-metallic metals, and the Plaintiff continued to supply co-days to the Defendant in accordance with the Defendant’s order from March 2013 to February 2015. The price for goods was paid in the manner that the Plaintiff supplied goods to the Defendant after supplying them, or the Defendant supplied the goods to the Plaintiff after paying the advance payment in advance, and then deducted the price for goods from the advance payment.

B. From April 25, 2013 to July 21, 2014, the Defendant asserted that the total amount of the goods that the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff during the said period was KRW 5,905,069,375, in the preparatory document dated September 13, 2017, the Defendant totaled KRW 5,905,070,415 to the Plaintiff from April 25, 2013 to July 21, 2014, the Defendant claimed that the total amount of the goods that the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff during the said period was KRW 5,905,069,375. However, according to the evidence No. 13-2, the amount paid by the Defendant on May 10, 2013 is not KRW 122,861,610, but KRW 122,862,650.

The amount of goods or advance payment was made.

C. The Plaintiff: (a) 253,50,50 won on March 30, 2013; (b) 308,621,99 won on July 10, 2013; (c) 191,004,000 won on August 7, 2013; (d) 217,045,961 won on September 30, 2013; and (e) 30,46.36.45 won on September 30, 2013; and (e) 318,40,676 won on September 30, 2013; and (e) 204.36.45 won on the supply of goods on September 31, 2013; and (e) 205 won on the supply of goods on September 318, 2017; and (e) 316.30,37.34 won on December 215, 2013013

On June 30, 2014, 395,563,423 won is the co-days Co., Ltd. which is the defendant's subsidiary company.

arrow