logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2021.01.21 2020고정474
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2020 Maz. 474】

1. On March 5, 2020, the Defendant: (a) sent gift certificates to the victim B, with money deposited, to the victim’s “100,000 won New World Gift Certificates (hereinafter “FFFF”); (b) on March 5, 202, through “Kakao Stockholm”); and (c) on deposit of money, the Defendant would send a gift certificates

“The phrase was false.”

However, even if the victim deposits money, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to send the gift certificates that can be used normally.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 900,00 as sales price of gift certificates to the Nonghyup Bank under the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim.

2. On March 6, 2020, the Defendant received KRW 855,000 from the injured party as the price for the gift certificates on the same day under the same method as the above paragraph (1).

3. On October 11, 2019, the criminal defendant against the victim E puts up a letter stating that he/she will access the Internet FF car page to purchase “DSL camera at low cost” instead of the Internet F car camera, and falsely speaks that he/she will purchase the 1.4 million won to the victim contacted with the victim.

However, the defendant did not have any particular property or revenue, while he did not have any intention or ability to send the goods to the victim by purchasing the camera, such as preventing the return of the excessive debt at the time.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was transferred KRW 1,400,000 from the victim to the bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

[200 Maz. 475]

4. On January 20, 2020, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim, who visited the victim via the Internet FF car page, stating that the Defendant would settle the fare by means of credit card settlement instead of the internal face value in cash, by remitting 81% of the Handphone charge imposed on this month to the victim via the Internet F car page.

However, it is true.

arrow