logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.25 2013가합81267
하자보수금 등
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning the conjunctive assertion on Defendant Daewoo Construction Co., Ltd. shall be dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a person who is a party to the instant apartment in Ulsan-gu and another 60 (Seoul-dong) Nam-gu and another 10 (hereinafter “the instant apartment”).

(2) The Defendant Samsung Home Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Home Co., Ltd”) is an implementer who constructed and sold the instant apartment, and the Defendant Samsung Heavy Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Construction”) is a new construction contractor of the instant apartment from Defendant Samsung Home Co., Ltd. under a contract with Defendant Samsung Home Co., Ltd. for the construction of the instant apartment.

3) Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Seoul Guarantee Insurance”)

(B) The company guaranteed the obligation to repair the defects of the apartment of this case by Defendant Daewoo Construction. B. The Defendant Daewoo Construction Co., Ltd. to conclude the defect repair contract for the apartment of this case is each of the defect repair contracts as indicated below (hereinafter “each of the instant defect repair contracts”) between the Defendant Samsung Construction and the Seoul Guarantee Insurance.

The guaranty creditor of each of the instant guarantee contracts was changed from the head of Ulsan-gu to the Plaintiff. The guaranty creditor of the instant guarantee contracts was 115-023-2007004783, Jul. 30, 2007 to July 29, 2008, or 474 215-023-20707, 20708-2074, 207. 807. 86. 7. 85, 207. 7. 86, 207. 85, 207. 7. 85, 207. 85, 207. 1,035, 846, 4743- 115, 2007- 207, 207. 7. 305- 15, 207. 207. 7. 305

C. On July 30, 2007, the apartment of this case, which had undergone a pre-use inspection of the apartment of this case, was constructed, and the Defendant Daewoo Construction failed to construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing regarding the apartment of this case, or changed differently from the defective construction or design drawing.

arrow