Defendant shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five hundred thousand won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Punishment of the crime

Despite the fact that the defendant is not allowed to operate a vehicle that is not covered by the mandatory insurance of motor vehicles, the defendant was operated by the defendant as the owner of the motor vehicle to work. The status of the motor vehicle owner as prescribed by the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is recognized.

On September 4, 2014, around 07:30 on September 4, 2014, the automobile insurance was operated on the street in the front of the Busan Yong-gu B, Busan Yyeong-gu, with the same new-dong air room in the same Gu, which was not covered by the automobile insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes of the de facto survey report (in particular, the status of insurance coverage), the following inquiry report (D);

1. Relevant Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Act on the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation;

1. The summary of the facts charged in this part of the indictment concerning the dismissal of prosecution under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is as follows: “The Defendant was driving a Drocketing car on September 4, 2014, and driving it on September 4, 2014, and driving it into the e-driving plane of the victim E-driving in the signal signal atmosphere due to negligence in the course of performing duties, while neglecting the duty of front-time navigation, while driving it on the surface of the e-driving-dong in Busan, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim G, who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, by causing approximately two weeks of medical treatment; and at the same time, the department equivalent to KRW 512,414,54,54,54,54,54,514,54,54,514, etc. of the damaged vehicle after exchange the damaged vehicle.”

This part of the facts charged is an offense falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim, which is submitted on October 7, 2014.