Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of each of the above penalties for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On December 31, 2014, at around 20:25, the Defendant: (a) destroyed two studios in a studio in a "Fudio for the operation of Victim E in Gwangju-si; (b) on the ground that there was a dispute with male and female members; and (c) there were two studios in an amount equivalent to KRW 138,00 in the market price owned by the victim; (d) two studios in an amount equivalent to KRW 30,500 in the market price; and (e) two studios in an amount equivalent to KRW 50,00 in the market price; and (e) two studios in an amount equivalent to KRW 735,00 in the market price and two studios in an amount equivalent to KRW 953,500 in the number of accompanying studs.

B. On December 31, 2014, the Defendant’s obstruction of performance of official duties is above the Defendant’s rank around 20:50.

At the same place as the above E’s report, H, a police officer belonging to the Mineyang Police Station G District G District, sent out one time as a drinking to the above H’s face face, with a warning, on the ground that H, a police officer belonging to the Mineyang Police Station G District, prevented the Defendant from committing a disturbance.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to the investigation of the case.

2. Defendant B

A. The Defendant’s obstruction of performance of official duties above 1-B.

At the same time and place as Paragraph 1, police officers, who are police officers belonging to the Mineyang Police Station G District G District G District, did not stop I, who was a police officer belonging to the same police station, and assaulted by flabing the I's flab and flab on several occasions.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to the investigation of the case.

B. The Defendant damaged the article for public use under the above 2-A.

At the same date, time, place as mentioned in paragraph (1), the police officer was arrested as an offender in the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties by obstructing the police officer's performance of official duties as mentioned above, and the police officer was connected to the G District of the

Defendant’s frightencing to go together;

In front of the above studio room, after the studio of J-JJ-Wurg dyp straw, the market price of 156,750 won was broken down.

Accordingly, the Defendant destroyed the goods used by public offices, thereby impairing their utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ 1.