logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.11.23 2017고단4092
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

From November 2014, the Defendant operated singing in Ulsandong-gu E. Around 2014, the Defendant’s spouse was only 1.5 million won in the month when the Defendant’s spouse applied for individual rehabilitation because of excessive debt. Around December 2014, the Defendant’s spouse was pregnant and was unable to normally operate the said F Singing and was in arrears. Around March 27, 2013, the Defendant borrowed KRW 28 million from G from around June 2, 2016, and borrowed KRW 56 million from H to June 2, 2016, and borrowed KRW 40 million from I to around January 2016, and thus preventing the so-called return of the Defendant’s debt exceeding the obligation to pay the monthly income.

1 The crime of fraud against the victim J

A. On February 15, 2016, the Defendant stated, at the Dong-gu, Ulsan-gu, and the Defendant’s office, that “The Defendant shall complete the payment of the damages to the victim J.”

However, the defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the money even if he borrowed the money from the injured party while preventing the return as above.

As can be seen, the Defendant promised to make reimbursement within three months from the victim’s deceiving the victim, and received KRW 20,000,000 from the account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On March 30, 2016, the Defendant stated, at the above place, that “Breck test has a franch test, and the money is to be lent to the victim.”

However, as above, the defendant has prevented the return of existing debts, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention of repayment or ability to repay.

On March 31, 2016, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was given KRW 8,00,000 to the Defendant’s account.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Fraud of the victim L;

A. On March 16, 2015, the Defendant F.

arrow