logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2014.08.28 2014고단432
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a business proprietor operating a “D Gameland” in Sil Jin-si. C.

The game machine “SUPPER DARGGT” is a game machine whose results are accumulated and accumulated exceeds 5,000 points when a game user opens the boom on the screen through active manipulation of three bags, and is rated by the Game Rating Board as follows: (a) if a boom, which is a obstacles that interfere with the shooting of the boom, is string, or if a brine, is fluor, one fluor, one fluor, one fluor, and one fluor, one fluor, one fluor, and one fluor is being carried out in accordance with the game user’s ability.

No one shall provide game products for the distribution or use, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Rating Board, or display or keep them for such purposes.

Nevertheless, from January 12, 2014 to June 35, 2014, the Defendant operated the said “D Gameland” from around 18:00 to around 16:35 of the same month, and, in using an automatic system different from the contents classified by the Game Rating Board, the game machine was classified as a prize and a lot section irrespective of the ability of game users, regardless of the ability of game users, and the Round, which is a obstructive object in some sections, does not reduce the lap, and the points are accumulated by driving only for the score factors, and the points are accumulated. In other sections, even if the lap, which is a obstructive object, does not fit for the lap, reduced the game and provided it to many and unspecified customers who visited the said “D” game so as not to affect users’ ability to play the game.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the classification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. E, F.

arrow