A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 1, 2013, around 17:20 on June 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) entered the victim C’s game room located in Daejeon Dong-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, as an auxiliary and auxiliary door, a glass door that the victim temporarily locked by using bricks; and (b) stolen cash 60,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement C’s police statement;

1. Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, requests for appraisal, reports on investigation (specific suspect), or written reports;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and reasons for sentencing under Article 329 of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of sentenced punishment: One month to six years of imprisonment;

2. Sentencing criteria [Determination of types of punishment] thieves group, thieves group on general property (the scope of recommending punishment): Imprisonment for a period of eight months to one year and six months: No special aggravation factor in cases of intrusion into any place other than indoor residential space:

3. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment for 8 months; and

4. Whether to suspend the execution or not: Proactive negative: A sentence of imprisonment is inevitable for the defendant, when comprehensively considering the following facts: the sentence is to be imposed on the defendant: the defendant has been repeatedly committed or has not been recovered from damage (the general reason for the suspension of execution): the defendant has been sentenced to a concurrent comparison and assessment) more than twice his previous convictions (the comprehensive comparison and assessment) and the defendant has been sentenced to a summary order twice as a result of larceny in 2013, the attitude of the act in this case has been defective, the damage has not been recovered, and the agreement with the victim has not been reached:

However, in comprehensive consideration of all the circumstances revealed in pleadings, such as the fact that the defendant reflects the crime and the amount of damage is a small amount, the punishment as ordered shall be determined within the scope of the recommended punishment.