logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.02.03 2012고단3347
공익사업을위한토지등의취득및보상에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for ten months, for defendant B, and for eight months, for each of the defendants D.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

A was notified of a summary order of a fine of KRW 1.5 million at the Suwon District Court on December 12, 2005, and on May 17, 2012, the Incheon District Court sentenced on two years of suspension of execution to imprisonment without prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and the said judgment was finalized on May 25, 2012. Defendant D was sentenced to one year of suspension of execution for a violation of the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation Therefor at the Seoul East District Court on May 20, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 28, 201.

In 207, the Water Resources Corporation, the main purpose of which is to develop and sell the land of 54,690,426 square meters of the RIS as an ecological environment and complex city in harmony between tourism, leisure and dwelling, has been to promote an urban development project to develop and sell the land of 54,690,426 square meters of the RIS as the development plan for the designation of the "S" development zone in the Official Gazette.

Where any loss is incurred due to the implementation of public works, a project operator shall make a fair compensation for the loss through consultation with landowners and persons concerned, adjudication or administrative litigation, and landowners and persons concerned shall not receive the compensation by fraud or other improper means in the process.

1. Defendant A, Defendant A, and B acquired the development information of the aforementioned “S” around March 2007, and installed the “the well-beingball bees” without the intention of both wings, and installed the “the well-being bees,” which did not actually engage in the mass-wing business, from the date of the public announcement of the development plan to the public announcement of the public announcement of the development plan, using the fact that the business compensation and living countermeasure site (the well-known bees) was paid in addition to the expenses for relocation of the bees. The fact is that the Vs included in the “S” development zone are very little flowers, and even if it is difficult to furn the bees due to the sea near the development zone, it was before the date of public announcement of the development plan for the S.

arrow