Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revocation shall be dismissed.

1. Basic facts

A. A. Around July 10, 2018, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant to manufacture and supply USD 10,000, an Acromatic 244,500 ($ 24.45,00 per Chapter 1 omitted) to the Defendant, and manufactured and supplied USD 7,400, an Acromatic 180,930 ($ 24.45,00 per Chapter 1 plus value added tax. Value added tax is USD 19,023) to the Defendant.

When the Plaintiff was unable to produce an Acrypty due to a factory fire, the Plaintiff and the Defendant modified the contract to manufacture and supply a polybrypty instead of an Acrypty on September 14, 2018, and the Plaintiff manufactured and supplied the Defendant with USD 48,724 ($ 18.74 per head office, USD 596.4 per head office, USD 53,596).

(hereinafter) The above contract for the production and supply of fences is called the “instant contract,” and the Acryle bryle and polysium under the instant contract are called the “the instant fence”).

The Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to deduct the heat treatment costs, transportation costs, etc. from the cost of the instant fence, and accordingly, the deduction amount is USD 5,166.58.

C. The defendant shall make 263,167.16 US$ 267.16 ($ 20,00,000 on July 11, 2018; USD 100,000 on July 13, 2018; USD 60,000,00 on August 22, 2018; USD 60,000 on September 3, 2018; USD 294,282,365 on October 1, 2018; USD 294,282,365 on October 1, 2018; USD 201.3,00 on March 1, 201; USD 201.3,00 on July 13, 2018; USD 2013,00 on July 1, 2018; USD 201.36,365 on September 21, 2018.

The payment was made.

recognized.