1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning for this part of the basic facts is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Summary of the parties' arguments

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff’s primary cause of claim (exercise of the subject claim) was created from the Deceased on May 1970 each of the instant land before the subdivision (after the subdivision, each of the instant roads was created after the subdivision).

2) The sales contract for the purchase of part of the purchase (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

(2) The Defendants, who succeeded to the deceased’s duty under the instant sales contract, should pay the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to the instant compensation amount, which is the object of the duty of ownership transfer registration under the instant sales contract, to the Plaintiff, inasmuch as the instant sales contract is not recognized as the Defendants’ claim (such as a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment, etc.) was impossible due to the Defendants’ cause attributable to the Defendants, the Defendants should pay the amount equivalent to the instant compensation amount to the Plaintiff.

B. The summary of the Defendants’ assertion 1) The evidence No. 12 through No. 17, which is an official document submitted by the Plaintiff, is merely a “report document” rather than a “disposition document,” and the document unilaterally prepared by a public official in charge, and thus, the probative value or credibility of the content cannot be acknowledged, inasmuch as there is no signature of the deceased.

B. Since the Plaintiff did not submit the consent, certificate of personal seal impression, and certificate of land right, the official document submitted by the Plaintiff is alone.