logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 (청주) 2021.02.03 2020누1712
영업정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and it is acknowledged that the facts of first instance and the judgment are legitimate even if the evidence submitted by the plaintiff to the court of first instance was added to the evidence submitted to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

From the completion of the registration of a measurement agency business, “after the completion of the registration of a water quality measurement agency business,” the two sides are as follows: “after the completion of the registration of a atmospheric measurement agency business on October 6, 2005,” “after the completion of the registration of a atmospheric measurement agency business.”

2 The term "2018" of the 11st parallel shall be "2017".

2 The Enforcement Rule of the Environmental Examination and Inspection Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Environment No. 833, Dec. 20, 2019; hereinafter referred to as the "Enforcement Rule of the Environmental Examination and Inspection Act") in 4 parallels are as follows.

3-4 to5 Happed “the discharging place on October 17, 2017” to “the discharge place on June 27, 2017 and four discharging places, including L Co., Ltd. and G, etc. on October 11, 2017.”

According to the statement of 6th 6th 1st "five emission business places" Eul "4 Eul 1-2, the company, the plaintiff of which was recorded as visited on October 11, 2017, is four companies (BB, M, K, and G) except J (P, October 2, 2017).

The discharge place shall be changed to "the discharge place of business".

6 The 6th 7th ped "the above 5 enterprises" shall be "the above 4 enterprises".

7 The phrase "this Court" of this Court shall be deemed to be "the first instance court".

7 Above 7 6-7 Hashe made, so it constitutes “in the case of making”.

“The following shall apply:

“Creat.”

Article 17 (1) 7 of the Environmental Testing and Inspection Act, and the defendant, on July 24, 2019, stated the legal basis as "Article 17 (1) 3 of the Environmental Testing and Inspection Act" while giving prior notice of the instant disposition, which constitutes the cause of the disposition.

arrow