1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The progress of the project of this case and the preparation 1 of the letter of this case) The plaintiff at the defendant's recommendation, the Seongbuk-gu Seoul site C (hereinafter "the real estate of this case").

) The business of purchasing and removing the unregistered buildings and building sites and selling them or constructing new buildings (hereinafter referred to as the “instant business”) after building sites.

(2) The Plaintiff paid KRW 1,925,00,000 to the Defendant for the purpose of the instant project from December 1, 1997 to July 27, 198, respectively, and KRW 150,000,000 around September 18, 200. The Defendant purchased the instant real estate with the said funds, and subsequently rendered a favorable judgment by filing a lawsuit for the removal of the instant real estate against the possessor (resident of the instant real estate) of the instant real estate, but did not withdraw the removal and occupant.

3) Afterwards, the Korean Private Teaching Institutes established an intention to purchase the instant real estate at the Korean Private Teaching Institutes in order to find out the intention to purchase the instant real estate. The Defendant attempted to remove the instant real estate occupant, but failed to do so in full. Ultimately, the possessor paid a total of KRW 815,00,000 to the possessor, and sold the instant real estate at KRW 7.3 billion on October 1, 2010 after receiving the delivery of the instant real estate. 4) The Plaintiff reported the transfer income tax after selling the instant real estate to the Korean Private Teaching Institutes in order to make the Plaintiff liable for the difference between KRW 2,890,000 (i.e., KRW 1,925,00,000, KRW 150,000,000, KRW 815,000,000,000 for the instant real estate occupant, and the Defendant was held liable for the difference between KRW 1,981,439,380,000) and the Defendant.

. a fact-finding certificate;