logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.03.31 2015고합281
특수공무집행방해치상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The defendant was sentenced to two years of suspended execution on May 1, 2015 by the Busan District Court, for obstruction of the performance of official duties, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 9, 2015, and is still under suspended execution.

[Criminal facts]

1. The Defendant is a driver of the Mart Motor Vehicle, who was injured by interference with the performance of special official duties, damaged public goods, and violated the Road Traffic Act (after the accident).

On September 16, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:55, while driving the car and driving the road in front of the landing bridge in the Don-dong, Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, the Defendant discovered that the victim E, the circumstances of the Don Police Station D, who belong to the Don-dong Police Station D, was under the influence of drinking.

The Defendant had the mind that he would escape by threatening to detect his drinking, and carried the said car by driving the patrol car (F) and getting off from the patrol car by blocking the front of the said car and getting off from the patrol car, the Defendant driven the said car, which is a dangerous object, and received twice more parts of the left part of the patrol car’s seat even, and the left part.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers concerning the crackdown on drinking, thereby suffering from injury to E, such as dynasium for two weeks. A patrol vehicle, which is an object used by a police station which is a public official's police station, damaged the repair cost to take approximately KRW 1,347,58, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as aiding the victims of traffic accidents.

2. On September 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) caused an accident as described in paragraph 1; and (b) on September 16, 2015, the Defendant continued to drive a e-mail apartment as listed in paragraph 1 at the e-mail in front of the 11-distance cross-section in the Ge-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-si; and (c) continued to abscond by driving a e-mail car listed in paragraph 1 at the “YG-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri

arrow