The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (an improper sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (an amount of KRW 4 million, a completion of a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. In a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). It is recognized that the Defendant is against the recognition of the instant crime, and the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment.

However, the judgment of the court below seems to have determined the punishment in consideration of such favorable circumstances, and there is no change of circumstances to newly consider the sentencing after the decision of the court below, and the crime of this case is committed by the defendant by compulsion because of the defendant's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her at late night

The defendant's argument of sentencing is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.