The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant in the facts charged is a car page of the website following the Internet, and the victim C was a member of the above car page. Since around May 2012, the Defendant and the victim were aware of the conflict due to mutual defamation and accusation, etc., the Defendant and the victim were aware of the conflict within the above car page as follows: “A person who filed a complaint or accusation against a senior executive officer,” “any portion of the group below the platform bed,” “a person who was a member of the house page,” “a person who was a member of the house page,” “a member of the house page,” and “a member of the broker who was flick and flicked with the operating team without any evidence.”

On August 31, 2013, the Defendant: (a) visited the said car page at a scopic place around 12:09 on August 31, 2013; (b) left the victim on the bulletin board, and posted the victim “Arhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn to the members of the Committee; (c) “Ihhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn to the majority of members of the Committee; and (d) Ihhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn to the majority of members of the Committee; and (d) Ihhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn to the majority of the members of the Committee; and (d) Ihhhhhhhhhhhhhn to the end of the Agreement.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. The facts charged of this case are the crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only when the victim files a complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act.