Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a victim C (hereinafter “victim”) employee of the Victim C Company, and D is a representative of the victim company.

In the written indictment, D, the representative of C, is written as the victim, but the damaged portion appears to be owned by C, and the interfered portion is also deemed to be owned by C, so the victim shall be changed ex officio to C, as it appears to be owned by C.

1. On January 30, 2018, around 16:30, the Defendant damaged the property by making payment of KRW 30,000,000,00,000 to the victim company’s office located in Bupyeong-si E Commercial Building No. 202, on the ground that, at around January 25, 2018, F, an employee of the said company, would not be paid as a substitute for the daily amount of KRW 30,00,00,000, the market price of the victim company on his/her own on his/her book, which was 30,000,000 won.

2. Whether the Defendant interfered with his duties is why she would give us us b, on the same date and at the same place as the above 1.1.

"Along with the disturbance of about 20 minutes, such as the damage of sound and chemical parts by hand, the employees at the place interfered with the telephone call with customers to interfere with the auction of the real estate of the victim company by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Investigation reports (12. Reporting on the handling of reported cases and attaching an on-site photograph), application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (referring to a witness G telephone call);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order (the defendant and his defense counsel had already completed the business of C at the time of committing the instant crime with respect to the obstruction of business.