The defendant shall be innocent.

1. At around 17:43 on July 29, 1994, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by a road management agency, by driving the freight of 11.1t on the 2 axis in excess of 10t of the limitation on the load capacity of CF vehicle owned by the Defendant in relation to the Defendant’s business at an expressway route.

2. The Constitutional Court rendered a decision of unconstitutionality on the portion of Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8315, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 8665, Oct. 28, 2010; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 2095; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 4777, Jan. 2, 2005; Act No. 83155, Oct. 2, 200) that “if an agent, employee, or other employee of a corporation commits an offense under Article 83(1)2,

3. Accordingly, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure