Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On July 30, 2016, the Defendant, at around 19:50 on July 30, 2016, brought a dispute with the lessee E in the above 201, over the lease problem under the 201st 201, with the Plaintiff’s operation of the Defendant in the Gangwon Yangyang-gun C, and turned out the string as a corridor in which the Defendant was pushing the victim with the victim, and carried out the arms into the 201 unit possessed by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant invadeds on the room possessed by the injured person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness E and F (the defendant and the defense counsel) (the defendant and the defense counsel have come to a brush in the victim's room as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment of the defendant, but the victim's visit had been set up rhydly and rhly in the vicinity of the part where the victim's interview had been held in open, and they had been moving. Thus, the peace of residence was

I argue that it cannot be seen.

However, the following facts and circumstances revealed by each evidence of the judgment, i.e., the Defendant and the victim, at the time of the occurrence of the instant case, did not have good appraisal. Thus, even if the victim’s visit was held, it may be anticipated that the Defendant would not allow the victim to enter the room in his possession, and the Defendant would have invaded against the victim’s will even if he could have sufficiently known such circumstances, and the Defendant would have been able to get out of the room, and the Defendant would have prevented the Defendant from posing any danger that he was placed in the door of the visit. However, the policeF dispatched to the scene at the time was called “the Defendant’s deduction of these things”, and the Defendant was taken out of the corridor at the time of the Defendant’s attempt to re-enter the victim, and there was a vagan while making the victim attempt to re-

In full view of the fact that it is difficult to believe the above assertion by the defendant, the defendant invaded the victim's room as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the defendant, thereby impairing the peace of residence.

Since it is reasonable to view the above assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel, the above argument is not accepted and applied to 1.