Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

The defendant was notified by the victim C that he was in an internal relationship with the victim C to organize the internal relationship, and the victim was found.

1. On September 1, 2014, at around 22:00, the Defendant: (a) found the main points operated by the victims located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D, thereby hindering the victim’s main places of business by force by having the customers look at the main points of the week, and putting the customers “marina” with the words “marina”, breaking them, breaking the disturbance, such as drinking, cupped, cooling, table, beer, beer machinery, and other strawing, and destroying them, thereby obstructing the victim’s main places of business by force.

2. Damage to property;

A. The Defendant damaged the victim’s property in such a manner that the sum of the main repair and the interior repair, such as alcoholic beverages, cups, clocks, and other straws by cutting off alcoholic beverages, cups, gyms, and other gyms, and gyms, in the time and place described in paragraph 1, as described in paragraph 1, exceeds KRW 1,610,000.

B. On September 1, 2014, the Defendant found an officetel that had lived with the victim in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, and destroyed 66 goods totaled of KRW 40,282,610, total market value of the victim-owned goods, as shown in the attached Table 1, by tearing or cutting down Handbags, clothing, passport, etc., which are the victim-owned.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written statement prepared in F, G, and H;

1. Detailed card showing the purchase of goods damaged by property damage, application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) or 313 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime; Article 314 (1) or 313 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that the defendant confessions and objects to the punishment of concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim, and the defendant