logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.01.11 2017고정1190
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of the Grandland Kapool.

On September 15, 2017, the Defendant driven a vehicle above 17:00 on September 15, 2017, and walked the road in front of the 88 small-scale post office located in the front side of the road. As such, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving service, had a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as checking the right and the right of the front side of the road and checking the safety of pedestrians, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim D (at the age of 18) who crosses the crosswalk as it is by negligence, to examine the parts behind the vehicle of the defendant on the right hand in order to avoid the collision with the vehicle of the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt panions requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational facts as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, and a diagnosis report;

1. Each of the above evidence reveals that each of the following photographs [the defendant, according to each of the above evidence, did not studio whether a person is approaching the vehicle at the time of the instant case and without properly checking it by a studio or a studio (which seems to have been believed only to have been believed to have been trusted only to the rear alarm), and the damaged person who passed the crosswalk was involved in the traffic accident by examining his hand in order to avoid the collision with the said vehicle, and the victim suffered from the injury of the tension and the tensions, such as the troke, elbow, shoulder, straw, etc., of the two weeks right-hand right-hand part of the instant case.

Therefore, the facts of the crime of this case are fully convicted.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) and Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Attraction of a workhouse;

arrow