logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.09.09 2015고단493
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 15, 2015, at around 21:00, the Defendant reported 112 as an assault with E within a “D” restaurant located in Sacheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, and was under control by G during the police box belonging to the police box of the Gyeongnam-gu Police Station, Gyeongcheon-gu, Gyeongcheon-si, Gyeongcheon-si, and was under control of the said G’s chest two times, and was sneeped.

As a result, the Defendant assaulted the above G as a police official, thereby hindering the legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigation and maintenance of order in the above G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to H and G;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is not good to obstruct the performance of official duties by causing violence to a police officer dispatched by the defendant in uniform. However, since the crime of this case was committed by the defendant, the crime of this case is committed against the police officer several times after the crime of this case, and the above police officer was committed against the defendant's wife by finding the above police officer several times after the crime of this case, and the defendant was committed against the defendant's wife, the defendant deposited the money to the above police officer, the defendant deposited the money with the above police officer, and the fact that the defendant has no criminal power other than fines twice due to the violation of the Road Act is considered as favorable to the defendant, and the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of the defendant's age, character and conduct and other various sentencing

arrow