1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from July 19, 2019 to April 2, 2020, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 30, 1984, the Plaintiff (1958) and two children (2 children, 1985, and 1987) are legally married couple who completed a marriage report with C (1958).

B. Since October 2008, the Defendant (1966s) established a relationship with C in the workplace (Cheongbuk-do Office of Education) with C. The Defendant maintained an unlawful relationship, such as sending text messages or letters expressing patriotism, and also having a sexual relationship with C, by referring them to “B”, “B”, “S”, and “new ditches.”

C. On June 8, 2018, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant for the claim of consolation money amounting to KRW 2018 Ghana26970 in this court. While the Defendant stated to the Plaintiff during the said lawsuit that the relationship with C was severed, the Plaintiff continued to engage in an unlawful relationship by October 2018, such as having C met at least several times.

Accordingly, on January 31, 2019, the court rendered a judgment ordering the defendant to pay consolation money of KRW 30,000,000 and delay damages to the plaintiff, taking into account the circumstances such as the content, period, and degree of the fraudulent act, the defendant's attitude after the fraudulent act was discovered, and the influence of the defendant's fraudulent act on the plaintiff's common life.

E. However, even after May 2019, the Defendant maintained unlawful relations, such as continuing to talk with C or having sexual intercourse on a vehicle.

[Grounds for recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 13 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination:

A. The fact of the occurrence of the liability for damages was recognized, and the Defendant asserted that “C was divorced from the Plaintiff,” and thus, “a person who has been divorced from the Plaintiff” several times in the written reply dated August 7, 2019. If only the C marriage certificate was removed from the preparatory document dated December 17, 2019, the Plaintiff’s side did not immediately know the C’s divorce, despite the fact that it was immediately known.