A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 20, 2018, from around 07:30 to 21:00 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s inspection operation by force by setting up a car at the front of the road at D entrance, which the Defendant operated by the Defendant, and making it impossible for those who prepare for the said D new map and tin to enter D by using the vehicle.

2. 퇴거 불응 피고인은 2018. 5. 8. 07:00 경 위 제 1 항 기재 장소에서 예불을 드린다며 들어가 그 때부터 목조건물인 선방( 禪房 )에 자신의 짐을 가져 다 놓아 피해자 C로부터 D에서 퇴거해 줄 것을 요청 받았고, 이후로도 피고인이 한밤중에 흰옷을 입고 사찰 주변을 돌아다니는 등 기이한 행동을 하여 이곳을 찾은 신도들 및 피해자와 잦은 마찰을 빚어 계속하여 피해 자로부터 D에서 퇴거해 줄 것을 요청 받았다.

However, the defendant did not comply with the request to leave the victim without justifiable reasons until he/she is arrested by a police officer accompanying him/her at around 10:23 on June 26, 2018.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G, H and C;

1. Application of field photographs and photographs under each Act and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with Business Affairs, Selection of Imprisonment), Article 319 (2) and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact of refusing to leave and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the aggravation of concurrent crimes

1. The defendant's parking of the vehicle by the defendant is only ordinary parking, and this does not interfere with the passage of other vehicles.

2. The judgment is based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court.