1. C:

A. Defendant A has jurisdiction over each real estate listed in paragraphs 1, 2, and 6 of the attached list.

1. In fact, the Plaintiff holds a claim against C for indemnity equivalent to the following amount:

Of KRW 33,948,420 and the above money, 28,871,389 won per annum from July 29, 1996 to June 19, 2015, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment, each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) on August 24, 1992, the ownership transfer registration for the instant real estate has been completed on August 24, 1992. The ownership transfer registration for the instant real estate was completed in each of the following table:

(B) On October 1, 1992, the Government District Court No. 9695, No. 9695, Oct. 1, 1992, the Government District Court No. 9695, Oct. 1, 1992, No. 9695, No. 9695, No. 30,000,000, and No. 30,000,000, and No. 30,000,000 registration offices of the Government District Court No. 10,000, No. 10598, Oct. 31, 1992; No. 30,000,000,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,000 won and 10,005,05,00 won and 1,00.

[Ground of Recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2-1 to 6, and 4 of evidence Nos. 2, the purport of the whole pleadings (as to defendant B), confession deemed as confession (as to Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act, and defendant A)

2. According to the above facts of determination, the secured claim of the instant right to collateral security was extinguished by the completion of extinctive prescription, since the fact that ten years have elapsed from the due date of the secured claim of the instant right to collateral security is apparent from the calendar point of view.