logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.02.09 2016가단259978
분양대금반환 등
Text

1. Plaintiff A’s creative logistics company, Defendant D and F’s primary claim, and Defendant B’s primary claim.

Reasons

(2) On June 23, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with H to manage and transport the vehicles delegated by Defendant Changsung Logistics, with the name of “G” (i.e., e-commerce business, supply agency business, etc.).

In addition, Defendant F is a person who sells or sells a truck through the Internet site called “I,” and around June 2016, the following advertisements were posted on the above Internet site:

On January 2, 2010, 2010, 200 tons of the car model/stal-type wing T-wing T-Wing T-Wing T-Wing T-Wing delivery site, the operation section of the E-Wing Center from E-Wing-Seoul, the monthly pay of KRW 4 million working hours from 09:00 to 17:00 of the Seoul metropolitan area, and the monthly pay of KRW 5,000,000 for each five day of the Seoul metropolitan area, the vehicle acceptance money of KRW 28,00,000 for the vehicle that can be paid for the freight deduction and hand-on payment for

* Job shares stable and * The original office and transportation are all clear.

* The extent of KRW 1-80,000 per opening, approximately 6-18 per day (4-80,000 won for a small product with a large package, KRW 1-80,000 per month)* The extent of KRW 500-8,000 per month sales, KRW 200,000 per month, and KRW 400-5,000 per month) Plaintiff F was in the office of Defendant F, located in Seocheon-si, J around June 2016. Defendant F guaranteed that Plaintiff F would have secured all of G’s home delivery from Defendant Changsung Logistics where Defendant D works, and that Plaintiff F would have secured a large amount of KRW 40,00,00 per day, KRW 70-8,000,00 per month, and KRW 200,000,000 per month, and that Plaintiff F.3 would not change the loan to Defendant F.28, 2016.

However, the sale price is 29,500.

arrow