logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.01.23 2013고단6694
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 22, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court, and a fine of 2 million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on July 3, 2009, respectively.

On November 21, 2013, at around 21:45, the Defendant driven a B-house under the influence of alcohol with approximately 100 meters alcohol concentration of about 0.098%, from the arms hold in front of the arms hold in the Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-dong to the front day of the Korea-si in the same Dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and report on the situation of driving under drinking;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of inquiry reports, such as criminal records, investigation reports (Attachment to previous records and copies of written judgments);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the order to attend a compliance driving lecture has a record of being sentenced to four times a fine due to drinking driving, the criminal liability of the defendant is unlimited, but the defendant is against the mistake, the defendant has no criminal record of suspended execution or more, the defendant has no criminal record of a suspended execution or more, and the defendant has determined the punishment as ordered in consideration of various sentencing factors as shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances

arrow