1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On June 16, 2013, at around 17:55, Plaintiff A (Plaintiff B is in her wife) applied two symptoms to the E Hospital operated by Defendant School Foundation C (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) in an emergency room, where the two symptoms occur after the two parts of the right are faced with the two parts of the parking lot prior to a month.

B. In an emergency room, Plaintiff A requested a medical examination and treatment to Defendant D, who is the Plaintiff’s consciousness, and Defendant D gave an explanation of the Plaintiff’s consciousness, Defendant D was a normal visit. The size and response of the brue, the brue movement, etc. were all the normal conditions of the brue movement, the sense of sense, and reflect on light. In the brain CT test, the brain CT test performed diagnosis and was presumed to have been brain-dead because there was no special opinion on blood transfusion, etc., and observed the progress of hospitalization.

C. Around 07:00 on June 17, 2013, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital claimed the pain and the fall of the vision and requested a compromise with the safe, the Plaintiff was in a state of expansion of the air space in the e-mail. The e-mail was measured higher than 36m Hg ( normal : 10-21m Hg). The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed as the e-mail closed angle, diagnosed as the e-mail, and taken measures to take part in the e-mail, the force of the internal pressure at around 09:36.

At around 11:15 on June 17, 2013, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed radr scarging scarging scarging in order to facilitate the flow of flood control in the Ansan-gu, and conducted radrging scarging scarging scarging and scarging scarging scarging scarging scarging scargings for 14:10 on the 15:45 on the 15:45 on the scarging scarging scargs.

Since then, at 21:00, the internal pressure was measured at Hgm of 38m and administered Toluene, and on June 18, 2013, the internal pressure was measured at 08:50m Hgm of 08:50m, and the Plaintiff explained the need for the corrected physical exposure, but the Plaintiff made a written request for medical treatment by wishing to receive medical treatment at other hospitals.

E. Plaintiff A on July 30, 2013