The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Since the traffic accident of this case by mistake of facts is not caused by the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below, the judgment of the court below which convicted each of the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the violation of the Road Traffic Act

B. The lower court’s sentence of unfair sentencing (two years of suspended execution in October, probation, and 40 hours of law-abiding lecture) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, in particular, the statement in the trial by the witness E, the analysis of traffic accidents, and the images of each photograph, etc., the Defendant is divided into the two lanes that are set up in the upper part of the second two lanes in the front of the third two lanes, from among the three-lanes in the front of the three-lane-dong airfield street crossing in Suwon-si, the change of the lane is impossible. On the left part of the two-lane in the above two-lanes, the left part of the left part is or seems to have been in the installation of the left road. While the vehicle was stopped to the traffic signal line after the traffic signal of the victim E (hereinafter referred to as the “victim vehicle”), and the damaged vehicle was opened to the intersection and proceeded with the straight right side of the damaged vehicle, and the front part of the damaged vehicle can be found to have been overtaken by the lower part of the lower part.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below to the same purport is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, and the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. Determination on the assertion of unfair sentencing