logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2015.06.02 2015고정68
근로기준법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, as a representative D in C of permanent residence, is an employer who engages in wholesale and retail business with 25 full-time workers, who intends to dismiss workers, shall give a prior notice at least 30 days prior to dismissal, and if he/she fails to give a prior notice at least 30 days, he/she shall pay the ordinary wages for at least 30 days

Nevertheless, the Defendant dismissed, from September 1, 201, E, working as a bread shed at the same place of business, without notice on July 24, 2014, and did not pay KRW 2.6 million equivalent to the ordinary wages for 30 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. Details of confirmation of fact, such as telephone;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each benefit ledger;

1. Relevant Article 110 of the Labor Standards Act and Articles 110 subparagraph 1 and 26 of the Labor Standards Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day converted);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Article 59(1) that the defendant has agreed to pay the advance notice of dismissal to E while the lawsuit in this case is pending, that there is a little error in the annual use of E in the course of dismissal, that there is no history of punishment for the same crime, and that there appears a attitude against the mistake

arrow