beta
Text
1. The Defendant: KRW 441,067,949 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from March 17, 2015 to December 21, 2017.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. When the Defendant entered into a contract for large-scale construction with a construction business license for one-story building on the ground outside C, Nam-si, Namyang-si, and concluded a contract for construction of 230 million won of the contract amount on July 8, 2014, changing a company into D without a construction business license, and entered into a contract for construction of 39.15 square meters of the warehouse building on July 8, 2014.
B. However, around September 2014, the Defendant changed the location and size of a warehouse and entered into a new contract on the ground of KRW 45 million between D and the contract amount by setting up two floors together. The Defendant changed the total floor area of the existing building construction permit of the first floor to 59 square meters on December 2, 2014, and obtained approval for the use of the total floor area of 494.79 square meters on the last floor of the warehouse of the first floor on December 30, 2015 with a design change permission on December 30, 2015.
C. On the other hand, on January 14, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant as of KRW 30 million, monthly rent of KRW 2.4 million, and the lease period from February 1, 2015 to January 30, 2017. From February 1, 2015 to February 1, 2015, the Plaintiff used the leased building to store gas supplies inside the leased building.
On March 11, 2015, the Defendant obtained a permit to extend the area of 367.80 square meters on the second floor of a warehouse building (367.80 square meters) on March 11, 2015, and D had a second floor extension work.
E. However, on March 16, 2015, after being awarded a subcontract for construction from D on March 16, 2015, the pipe cutting work attached from the second floor to the Sti-pppppp panel, and the fire with the flame to the Sti-pppppp panel occurred. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s main supplies (Paghp products) located inside the premises of the first floor leased by the Plaintiff were entirely discharged.
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 6 through 24, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including each number), witness F, E's testimony, and the remaining shares of this court.