The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., both types of imprisonment without prison labor) of the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and reflects the defendant.

B. However, in full view of various circumstances, including the following: (a) the Defendant’s traffic accident leading the victim with the remaining crosswalks in violation of the signal, and the quality of the crime is not very good; (b) the victim suffered serious injury requiring medical treatment for about 14 weeks; (c) the victim did not agree with the victim; and (d) the damage recovery was not made; and (e) the Defendant’s age, details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime were committed, even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.