A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is an employee of “D” in C, and is engaged in labor union activities with the victim E (the age of 44) who is a company partner.

At around 22:10 on June 3, 2013, the Defendant, at the 5 cafeteria of “G” restaurant F, had a difference between the Defendant and the Defendant’s employees, including the victim, as a matter of consultation with the labor-management with the ordinary victim. However, the Defendant thought that the Defendant was neglected from the victim, or that it was unreasonable for the victim, that it was “the company’s life.” The Defendant collected one of the small-beer and one beer who had the table table and one beer who was the victim.

After that, the defendant entered the cafeteria, which is a deadly weapon ( approximately 32 cm in total length, approximately 20 cm in blades), and went to the restaurant parking lot where the victim was the victim.

In the above parking lot, the defendant has served as a knife on the right side of the victim with the above knife that knife knife knife while knife with the victim.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim about four weeks of medical treatment, such as credit blood, fry, chest, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police officers and prosecutor's protocol of statement regarding E;

1. Investigation report ( impossible, etc. to seize criminal implements);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation ( normal consideration, such as the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case with a primary offender and is in profoundly against his nature, and that he agreed with the victim);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62 (1) (restatement of the same conditions as the above) of the Criminal Act or more;