The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On May 21, 2013, at around 10:45, the Defendant: (a) brought up the victim D(n, 40 years of age) who was divorced from the agreement with ASEAN on the roads front of the competent post office located in 118-2, Suwon-dong, Daegu, on May 21, 2013; (b) brought about the victim D, who is the victim’s seat, in the E vehicle; and (c) brought the victim into the ethbbbbb, which was in his hand, brought about a diveal coordinate that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. A fine not exceeding 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day);

1. The defense counsel's assertion about the defense counsel's assertion under Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Code (which means that there are circumstances to consider the process of committing a crime; the defendant is the first offender; the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant; the age of the defendant and all other circumstances) of the Suspension of Sentence means that the above act constitutes self-defense or legitimate act. However, in full view of the manner of committing a crime in this case, the circumstances surrounding the crime, the circumstances at the time of the crime, the degree of the victim's situation, etc., it is reasonable to deem that the defendant's act was an act committed with the intent of attack beyond a simple defense and it cannot be viewed as self-defense or legitimate act. Thus,