logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2019.11.29 2019고단1459
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of five months.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 7, 2015, the Defendant was subject to a disposition of having been convicted of committing an offense of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the head office of the Changwon District Prosecutors' Office, and on July 31, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of indictment at the head office of the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office as an offense of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and on May 25, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of indictment at the Seoul Central Prosecutors' Office as an offense of aiding and abetting, and on February 15, 2019, was sentenced to the suspicion of committing an offense of aiding and abetting at the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office of Daejeon District Prosecutors

On June 4, 2019, the Defendant accepted the proposal to the effect that if the Company Fund was deposited into the passbook in the Defendant’s name, it would be withdrawn and changed to employees.

On June 4, 2019, an employee in the name of the Defendant was issued five million won through a bank account (Account Number: D) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim B by calls to the victim B, stating that “a member in charge of lending at low interest shall be avoided, and a member in charge of lending to other accounts shall first request the repayment of loans to other accounts.”

The defendant was investigated several times due to the fact of the transfer of passbook and cash withdrawal related to Bosing, and was sufficiently aware that such abnormal loans were related to Bosing. The defendant was aware of the fact that he was not able to obtain credit, and that he was aware of the fact that he was not able to obtain credit, and that he was aware of the fact that he was able to use the bank account under the name of the defendant for the crime of Bosing, such as lending companies, type of loans, terms, conditions, etc. of the lending company, which was proposed without properly confirming the fact that the member of the organization under the name unscam in the name of the defendant was able to use the bank account under the name of the defendant, but he was able to make a timely loan. Accordingly, the defendant was aware of the fact that he was able to use the bank account under the name of the defendant for the crime of Bosing and then offered the bank account under the direction of the above defendant on June 13:09, 201.

arrow