The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the purport of the grounds for appeal that the Defendant agreed with the victim D (hereinafter “victim”), the Defendant led to confession and reflects, and the Defendant is at the location to support his wife and his father scheduled to enter the university, etc., the sentence of imprisonment (four months of imprisonment) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, each of the crimes of this case committed each of the crimes of this case, even when considering the following facts: (a) each of the crimes of this case was committed by the Defendant by intrusion into the guide room of the her motherel operated by the victim and that the case was not less than against the law; (b) the Defendant had been punished for larceny several times in the past (one time of imprisonment, one time of suspended execution of imprisonment, one time of suspended execution of imprisonment, three times of fines); (c) on October 13, 2010, the Jeju District Court sentenced the Defendant for four months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Jeju District Court, and committed each of the crimes of this case during the repeated period on February 10, 2011, while the execution of the punishment was completed, each of the crimes of this case was committed during the repeated period. In full view of all the circumstances that the Defendant already committed during the repeated period, other character, conduct and environment of the Defendant, the background and result of each of the crimes of this case, and the circumstances after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.