A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On June 13, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court’s Netcheon Branch on September 12, 2013, a fine of KRW 1.5 million as the same crime in the same court on September 12, 2013, and a fine of KRW 5 million as the same crime in the same court on March 14, 2014, respectively.

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from D Driving) is a person who is engaged in driving a car at BNAS car, and around 00:55 on July 12, 2020, the Defendant driving the said car with blood alcohol concentration of 0.120% on July 12, 202 and entered the front intersection in C at the time of running it from E.

At the time, there was a new wall at the time, and since the place is on which the passage of a vehicle is frequent, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to look at the front side and the left side, and to accurately manipulate the operation and the steering system of a vehicle in order to prevent accidents in advance.

However, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the front-time of the Defendant’s driving of the F (F, South, 59 years old) driving on the right side from the left side of the running direction to the right side of the Defendant’s driving direction, and received a part of the Gysta taxi driving ahead of the front side of the Defendant’s car.

The Defendant, as seen above, driven the said car under the influence of alcohol that it is difficult for the Defendant to drive the said car, and caused the victim H (ma, 43 years old) who was the seat of the said rocketing taxi, to suffer injuries, such as salt ties, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant was driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.120% in a section near D at a time near D at a time, such as the statement in Paragraph 1, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.120%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of the police officer statement with H;

1. The circumstantial statement of a drinking driver, the notification of the results of the control of drinking driving, and the circumstantial report;

1. Cases of reporting a medical certificate 112;