The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. There is no difference in the fact that the Defendant abused the victim.

B. Legal principles (self-defense or legitimate act) even if the defendant committed an act of brushing the center of the victim by brushing or committing an act of brushing the victim in the course of an extreme assault by the victim and C, such act constitutes a passive act of resisting the victim. Thus, it constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act.

2. The judgment was examined, the evidence duly examined and adopted by the court below and the following circumstances recognized by the court below. ① The victim consistently stated from the police investigation conducted at K Hospital on December 30, 201, the date of the occurrence of the instant case, to the point of view that the victim was suffering from the mental retardation of the Defendant, and the victim was faced with the same salves as the victim, G and C consistently with the victim's witness G. ② The victim was using H's cell phone numbers with H's cell phone numbers received from the victim's first-class and stored H's cell phone numbers in the victim's own cell phone and stored H's name as the perpetrator, and the victim was unable to be seen to have been salved from the victim's body in light of the fact that the victim was salved, and thus, it was difficult to view that the victim was salved from the victim's body in light of the fact that the victim was salved, despite the absence of assault by the victim.