1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claims extended by this court are all dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit after filing the appeal.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion and the Defendants are the occupants of Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government D apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”), and the Plaintiff served as the chairman of the council of occupants’ representatives from January 1, 2012 to June 19, 2015. Defendant B served as the said representative from January 1, 2012 to May 19, 2013 and January 1, 2018.

From February 2, 2013 to May 2017, the Defendants filed a complaint against the Plaintiff on several occasions due to occupational breach of trust or embezzlement, etc., or informed the press of the Plaintiff of the fact that the Plaintiff, the president of the council of occupants’ representatives, from February 2, 2013 to May 2017, such as the Plaintiff’s wrongful accounting, omission of the phrase of payment of bid bond in the bid bond to the guard company, failure to receive bid bond, and calculation of the cost of repair of the instant apartment, etc., and damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation by either posting a ticket on such content at the entrance of the apartment of the instant case or leading the Plaintiff

Therefore, the Defendants are obliged to pay consolation money, such as the entries in the purport of the claim, to the Plaintiff as mental damage suffered by the Plaintiff due to the aforementioned tort.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence No. 8 and No. 23 of the judgment on the claim for consolation money in relation to the assembly in the latter part of the apartment complex of this case from October 30, 2014 to November 14, 2014, the Defendants informed the F press reporter around October 22, 2014 to the effect that “The Plaintiff, the president of the council of occupants’ representatives, was participating in the bidding without receiving a bid deposit from the successful bidder in the process of selecting the security service company, which was in the end of March 2012, and thereafter, the relevant company submitted the forged document, even though the contract was reversed, it was not received from the said company after receiving the forged document.” In relation to the F press on October 22, 2014, the Defendants informed the F press reporter of the purport that “The Plaintiff, the president of the council of occupants’ representatives, participated in the bidding.”