Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:00 on June 1, 2014, the Defendant was punished for trial expenses due to C and charges that were lowered from D-si in front of the Dongambridge, 413-1-ro, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, for a white-ro of 01:0.

In this context, F, a police officer belonging to the Bupyeong Police Station E, who was under drinking control, was trying to see the dispute between the defendant and the above C.

The Defendant, who was informed by the above F that he would pay the taxi fee and return home from the above F, would act in favor of the above F in favor of the said C, and took a bath.

In the process, the Defendant, in light of the above F’s her her m, was her son at the time of six times, thereby obstructing the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties regarding the maintenance of order of the F.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order include the confession and reflect of the instant crime; the fact that the Defendant has not committed any other criminal offense except the punishment twice by a fine; the fact that the Defendant has made a deposit for the police officer without any other criminal record; the motive and circumstances leading to the instant crime; and the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered by