beta
Text
A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months for the crimes of No. 2 and No. 3 as stated in the judgment of the defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] The Defendant’s indictment on July 21, 201 is written on February 9, 2012, but it is obvious that it is a clerical error in light of the following evidence.
The Seoul Central District Court sentenced one-year imprisonment for a crime of fraud to two-year probation, and the judgment was finalized on February 9, 2012. On February 20, 2013, the written indictment for ten-month imprisonment for a crime of fraud was sentenced to two-year probation in the written indictment for ten-month imprisonment. However, in light of the following evidence, it is obvious that the written indictment is a clerical error.
A person who was sentenced and became final and conclusive on May 23, 2013.
【Criminal Facts】
"2019 Highest 1015"
1. The defrauded against the victim C is an actual operator of the LAD which operates the real estate development business, and the victim C is a person who invested in the development project of the development project of the Crossing-gun Epenta complex promoted by the above company around October 2007 and received 20 square pentacium sale, and paid approximately KRW 90,950,000,000 in total, from February 2, 2008 to May 2008, as land and construction costs.
On October 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant had FF of the employees of the said company make phone calls to the victim, i.e., “C., 20 square meters-type 1st floor, but the Defendant may construct a double-story 1st floor-type 2nd floor-type 2nd floor-type 1st floor-type 2nd floor-type 2nd floor-type 2nd 2nd 2nd 2009.” The Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The rent would be increased if the building was built as the second floor-type 2nd 2nd 2nd
However, at that time, the defendant had been accused of fraud from other investors due to the delay in the above Epenta complex business, or had difficulty in securing business funds by being subject to provisional seizure of the property owned by the defendant, and the investment funds received from investors in the two complex business newly promoted to meet this needs to be appropriated for the above complex business.