beta
Text
The sentence of a defendant shall be 3,000,000 won.
When a fine is to be paid, it shall be confined in a workhouse for 30 days.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant, “2017 Highest 2434,” became aware of D, E, and F in the following Internet carpets.
On April 15, 2017, the Defendant said that, around 23:50 on April 15, 2017, the Hart in Jung-gu Seoul Jung-gu said, the Defendant “assume” means that, by dividing the age club fee to a third person.
The third person believed the horses as they are, i.e., 510,000 won in total from 170,000 won in the defendant, and 1,50,000 won in total at the additional cost of 04:00 on the same day.
In fact, the Defendant paid 30,000 won to a third party without any intention or ability to share the cost, such as the drinking value, and was planned to use the remaining money in mind, and paid 926,000 won for total costs, including 230,000 won that the Defendant should bear, and then used 34,000 won for his own taxi.
The Defendant obtained 265,500 won (23 million won) by deceiving the same victim D, E, and F, and acquired 34,000 won.
2. On July 11, 2017, the Defendant, around 2017, 20:40, around 20:3391, the Defendant, at the “K” entertainment station managed by the J on the first underground floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, provided the amount of KRW 315,00 with alcohol, alcohol, etc. as if he/she would pay the drinking value.
However, the defendant was not able and able to pay the drinking value.
The defendant got 315,00 won by deceiving the victimJ and acquired pecuniary profits.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Statement made by the police to J;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E and D;
1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act of the Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 347 of the Criminal Act) provides that the period of repeated crime was in force, and the method of commission of crime is not good.
It is very bad that the second case occurred on the first day after being tried in the first case.
There are several criminal experiences.
It shall be taken into account the circumstances that the amount of damage is not significant and that the victims agreed smoothly with each other.
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;