beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant was a person who operates curios business, and the defendant was aware of the victim C through B, which was a landmark in 2015.
On October 2016, 2016, the Defendant, as the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, purchased the victim’s own Dognetism in the vicinity of the 294 Western Station, and can sell it to China more than the estimated value in the Republic of Korea.
When investing in money to purchase the Do self, it is intended to purchase the Do self and distribute the profits from selling it to China.
Unconditioned condition may be sold for one week.
It will be liable for any harsh damage.
“A false representation was made.”
However, even if the victim invests in his own purchase price, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to distribute the proceeds by selling himself as the promise.
However, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of crimes attached to the Defendant, acquired a total of KRW 12,20,000 on four occasions from November 3, 2016 to November 11, 2016 from the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness C and B;
1. The details of transactions (where the injured party bears expenses, the accused only decided to purchase and sell his/her own will and distribute the remaining profits to the injured party, and can sell them to the injured party within a week;
that if the damage is incurred, it shall be liable.
In other words, I argue that there is no enemy who is the victim.
However, in full view of the evidence in the ruling, the defendant can purchase the victim's own Dog in Korea and sell it to the victim more than the estimated value in Korea.
Since the business partners were identified, they can be sold within a week.
The principal will be guaranteed if the damage occurs.
The facts that the Defendant stated, however, was actually purchasing, and the Defendant could not take profits from China because he did not go to China. The Defendant believed the Defendant’s own land until he went to China.