Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

However, the execution of the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 10:30 on April 21, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 that “E, a police officer affiliated with the Gyeongnam-gu Police Station D police box of the Gyeongnam-gu Police Station, who was sent to the scene, carried the Defendant at the seat of the Defendant and her house ask her for she.” On the part of the Defendant, the Defendant used her desire to she, “I will see, she will she she she, she will she she, and she will see, she will she she, she will see, she will she she, and she will hear, she will she see, she will she she, she will do so, and she will hear, she will do so.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning civil petition handling affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Consideration of the fact that police officers who have suffered damage appeal to the defendant's wife, reflective fact, the first offender, and the fact that the defendant is a student who has yet to age);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for confinement in a workhouse (where a sentence of suspension of execution of punishment is invalidated or revoked, and the defendant fails to pay a fine);