Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, the spouse of the Victim C (W, 40 years old) committed conflicts with each other due to the belief of the religion “D,” and was living separately with the victim on May 7, 2013. On May 14:0, 2013, the Defendant talked about whether the victim was entitled to receive insurance premium for a car in the name of the husband by leaving the phone from the victim, and tried to find the victim’s desire from the victim to the Suwon-gu E, Suwon-si, the victim’s relative relationship with the victim residing.

The Defendant, at that place, deemed “a person who has come out of the Drown meeting, and experienced the victim’s talk.” However, the Defendant, with yellow tape in a ward, she would not have any victim, she would see the victim’s surrounding condition, prevented the victim from getting out of the room, and prevented the victim from getting out of the house, and arrested the victim, after having prevented the victim from getting out of the house the victim’s knife with the above yellow tape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A written statement prepared in C;

1. Voluntary reports, investigation reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing damaged photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 276 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant's act of combining the victim's body in tape is dangerous that may cause physical harm. However, the act is that the defendant's primary crime is the first crime, and the defendant is seriously opposed to the defendant's confession in the crime, the victim's act is contingent in the motive to persuade the victim who is in inter-non-divist religion, the victim's wife against the defendant. In addition, the motive, means and result of the crime in this case, circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, character and behavior, and family environment, etc.