1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. On April 3, 2017, the Defendant against the Plaintiff (Certification Number: C).

(4) On the other hand, on the 5th anniversary of the overall evaluation of the technology of this case, the following questions or opinions were written: (i) there is discrimination with the existing product; (ii) revision of the name of the product (except for smart lines); (iii) consideration at the time of writing the terms of dust; (iv) AI members are deemed to have outstanding performance and quality due to the use of high heat and electricity; and (v) AJ members applied the form of connection newly introduced in the Republic of Korea with the Copper, with the composition of an electric distribution team at which the Copper would apply; (iv) it is deemed to have high size and structural usefulness; and (v) it is deemed to have improved new technology compared to the existing technology; and (iv) on March 5, 2015, the report on the examination of new products (Evidence No. 4); (iv) 0-20-10-20-205-205-20-200-205-205-200-205-20-200---2000----2000

One of the main performance comparisons with existing products.