beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On March 18, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Busan District Court to a fine of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act. On April 23, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million from the Busan District Court to a fine of KRW 3 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act. On June 25, 2010, the Defendant violated a summary order of KRW 4 million by receiving a fine of KRW 4 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Busan District Court.
【Criminal Facts】
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a truck of 4.5 tons of Korean specialty technology;
On April 20, 2019, the Defendant driven the above truck while under the influence of alcohol of 0.138% of blood alcohol concentration on Apr. 20, 2019, and proceeded in the D front road located in Kimhae-si C, along the three-lanes on the 4-lane road, from the e hospital room.
At that time, the signal was installed, and the direction signal of the truck was the stop signal. In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by stopping the driver according to the new code and driving safely by checking well the right and the right of the driver.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to stop the vehicle driving signal while driving on the front side of the Defendant, and received the back part of the G Poter, Spos, Spos, and the back part of the cargo flosing down, which was driven by the victim F (the age of 60) who was parked along the vehicle stop signal, from the front side of the said truck, and caused the victim H (the age of 57) who was parked in front of the said truck due to its shock, to have the back part of the said truck driven by the victim H (the age of 57).
Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in performing the above business so that there is no one in two open for two weeks of medical treatment to the victim F.