The defendant is not guilty. The summary of this judgment shall be published against the defendant.

When the accused in charge of facts charged opens and takes a book, he/she has a duty of care to keep the dog and protect the dog with a gear, such as a shoulder or reeding, and to prevent any danger in advance so that any person who passes may not injure or injure the dog.

At around 08:40 on April 8, 2014, the Defendant, at the Government-si, 08:40 on the 117th Ethical apartment 10, the 117th Ethical apartment 103, he did not wear protective equipment, such as necking or reeding, to his own 2 math, and carried out a walthro (hereinafter “the instant pathian”) on the right bridge of the victim, where the Defendant’s walthrods (the instant pathian, the two-year students, and the hereinafter “the instant pathian”) passed the above place.

As a result, the Defendant neglected the above duty of care and caused the negligence to open the two sites of the right-hand side where the number of treatment days cannot be known to the victim.

Judgment

As evidence to acknowledge the facts charged in the instant case, there is a statement in the victim’s investigative agency and this court’s statement to the effect that the stronger of this case himself/herself was involved, and the victim’s statement in this court and the statement to the effect that “when viewed in a photograph, it appears that it is highly likely that he/she was involved in the river, and the present state is not well visible” as it was prepared on April 14, 2014.

According to the photographs of the injured party, the victim's wife is open in two forms, such as the right bucks and tackbucks, and about 0.5 cm on the part where the macks get off.

However, when considering the form of the baby of the instant stronger as confirmed through the Defendant’s evidence Nos. 12-1 through 4’s photo, the interval of the speaker reaches approximately 2.5 cm above and approximately 2 cm below.

In this regard, taking into account that the damage to the skin caused by the dogmatic observation of the Doctrine of the Doctrine of the Doctrine of the Doctrine of the Doctrine, the distance of the damaged Doctrine is shorter than the distance between the Doctrine of the Doctrine of the Doctrine and the Doctrine of the Doctrine.