1. The defendant shall deliver the following parts to the plaintiff:

(1) Attached drawings among the second floor B 205, Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si.

Since December 10, 2015, the Defendant did not dispute the fact that the lease is in arrears until now. Therefore, barring any special circumstance, the Plaintiff’s claim for the return of the leased object due to the termination of the lease based on the overdue rent is justified.

The defendant shall seek the interruption of litigation procedures on the grounds that he was subject to a decision to open the rehabilitation procedures.

(1) When a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures is rendered, the litigation procedures to be interrupted shall be interrupted with respect to the debtor's property when a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures has been rendered pursuant to Article 59 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act.

(Ga) In this case, a claim for money such as overdue rent, and a claim for money in arrears filed by the Plaintiff together with the delivery of a building does not constitute a lawsuit for delivery of leased object cited in this part of the judgment, as a result of the decision to commence rehabilitation proceedings against the Defendant.

The plaintiff's claim for this part is justified.