All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who works as an English instructor and is a victim B (n, 20 years of age) and victim C (n, 30 years of age) who is a victim C. 'D cafeteria' employee.

가. 모욕 피고인은 2016. 1. 30. 04:30 경 서울 마포구 E 소재 'D 식당' 내에서 동 장소 직원인 F 외 불상의 손님들이 있는 가운데 피해자 B에게 ' 퍽 킹, 비치 (beach) '라고 욕을 하여 공연히 모욕하였다.

B. After committing the crime of assault A, the victim assaulted the victim C in a manner of selling the inside part of the victim three times on the ground that C had prevented himself/herself at the front of the same place as that set forth in paragraph (a).

2. Of the facts charged under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act, the offense of insult under Article 312(1) is an offense for which a public prosecution may be instituted only when a complaint is filed under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. The offense of assault under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since all victims after the prosecution of the instant case indicate their intention not to punish, it is so decided as per Disposition under Article 327 subparag. 5 and 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.